安全从业人员职业认同测量模型的构建及应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.004

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 22-29.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.004

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

安全从业人员职业认同测量模型的构建及应用

付净^1,2 讲师, 聂方超², 吕巍³, 何敬森⁴, 刘虹¹, 陈微微¹

1 吉林化工学院资源与环境工程学院,吉林吉林 132022;
2 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083;
3 铁法煤业(集团)有限责任公司小康煤矿,辽宁铁岭 112700;
4 吉林金隅冀东环保科技有限公司,吉林吉林 132022

收稿日期:2020-08-19 修回日期:2020-10-18 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
作者简介:付净 (1984—),女,吉林省吉林市人,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事行为安全、系统安全理论方面的研究。E-mail:13689796832@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然基金重点项目资助(51534008);吉林省高教学会重点项目(JGJX2019C35);吉林化工学院校级重大项目(2020017);吉林化工学院新工科专项课题(XGK201904)。

Development and application of professional identity measurement model for safety practitioners

FU Jing^1,2, NIE Fangchao², LYU Wei³, HE Jingsen⁴, LIU Hong¹, CHEN Weiwei¹

1 College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin Jilin 132022, China;
2 College of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
3 Xiaokang Coal Mine,Tiefa Coal Industry (Group) Co., Ltd., Tieling Liaoning 112700, China;
4 Jilin Jinyu Jidong EP Technology Co., Ltd., Jilin Jilin 132022, China

Received:2020-08-19 Revised:2020-10-18 Online:2020-11-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为更清晰地了解安全从业人员的职业心理状态,充分发挥其职业效能,基于中外安全从业人员职业定义及角色差异分析,利用枚举分析法(MECE),构建职业认同测量模型;整理分析144份调研数据后发现,安全从业人员整体职业认同呈现中等水平,个体特征因素中,不同的工作年限、职业资格及技术职称对潜变量职业认知呈现显著差异,不同的人员教育层次对目标项职业认同呈现显著差异,且表现为正相关性;结果显示,本科教育层次人员的职业认同水平最高。研究表明:职业认同测量模型可从6维层面反映安全从业人员的职业认同水平,全面衡量个体特征因素差异对潜在变量及目标项影响的显著程度,同时突出教育层次差异对专业人员自我认知与职业效能评估的影响。

关键词: 安全从业人员, 职业认同, 测量模型, 角色, 行为倾向

Abstract: In order to study occupational psychological state of safety practitioners more clearly and too fully bring into play their professional efficiency, a measurement model of professional identity was developed by using method of Mutually Exclusive Collectively Exhaustive (MECE) based on analysis of career definitions and role differences of safety practitioners between China and foreign countries. Then, data of 144 objects were collected and analyzed and it was found that their professional identity was at a medium level. Additionally, there were significant differences in occupational cognition of latent variables influenced by individual characteristics, such as working years, professional qualifications and technical titles. Different levels of personnel education also led to significantly diverse professional identity of target items, and they were in a positive correlation. It was also found that personals of undergraduate education level received highest professional identity. The research shows that this model can reflect professional identity of safety practitioners from six dimensions, comprehensively measure significance of individual characteristic factor difference on potential variables and target items, as well as indicate influence of educational level on self-cognition and professional evaluation of safety practitioners.

Key words: safety practitioner, professional identity, measurement model, role, behavior disposition

中图分类号:

X910
X911

付净, 聂方超, 吕巍, 何敬森, 刘虹, 陈微微. 安全从业人员职业认同测量模型的构建及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 22-29.

FU Jing, NIE Fangchao, LYU Wei, HE Jingsen, LIU Hong, CHEN Weiwei. Development and application of professional identity measurement model for safety practitioners[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 22-29.

参考文献

[1] 帕丽达·买买提, 米合日阿衣·阿尔肯, 骆朝辉,等. 中文版护生职业认同量表在高校护理专业学生中应用的信度和效度分析[J].新疆医科大学学报,2016,13(11): 1 456-1 459.
PALIDA Bhatti, MICHIAH Alken, LUO Chaohui, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nursing students'professional identity scale at Chinese nursing students [J].Journal of Xinjiang Medical University, 2016,13 (11): 1 456-1 459.
[2] 丁刚.企业人力资源管理者职业认同的影响因素及作用机制研究[D]. 天津: 南开大学, 2014.
DING Gang. The research on the antecedents and consequences for human resource manager's professional identification in enterpiese [D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2014.
[3] 张雪.煤矿企业中层管理者的职业认同研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2017.
ZHANG Xue. A study on the professional identification of middle managers in coal mine enterprise [D].Changchun: Jilin University, 2017.
[4] HALE A R, PINEY M, ALENSBURY R. The development of occupational hygiene and the training of health and safety professionals [J]. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 1986, 30(1): 1-18.
[5] HALE A R. Occupational health and safety professionals and management: identity, marriage, servitude or supervision?[J]. Safety Science, 1995, 20(2/3): 233-246.
[6] MADSEN C D, HASLE P, LIMBORG H J. Professionals without a profession: occupational safety and health professionals in Denmark[J].Journal of Safety Research, 2019,113(3): 356-361.
[7] PROVAN D J, DEKKER S W A, RAE A J. Benefactor or burden: exploring the professional identity of safety professionals [J]. Safety Science, 2018, 66 (9): 21-32.
[8] 储兆晶,王冰洁.高校辅导员职业认同研究[J].河南理工大学学报:社会科学版, 2020, 21(1): 99-105.
CHU Zhaojing, WANG Bingjie. College counselor professional identification research [J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition, 2020, 21 (1): 99-105.
[9] 胡文文, 阎明. 国内职业认同研究综述(2005—2019)[J].现代商贸工业, 2019(31): 77-80.
[10] 陈洪伟.化工企业安全管理人员胜任力研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2009.
CHEN Hongwei. Study on the safety manager competency model of chemical enterprises [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2009.
[11] BEIJAARD D, MEIJER P C, VERLOOP N. Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2004, 20(2): 107-128.
[12] HALE A R, HEMING B, CARTHEY J. Modeling of safety management systems [J]. Safety Science, 1997,26 (1): 121-140.
[13] HALE A R, BIANCHI G, DUDKA G, et al. Surveying the role of safety professionals: objectives, methods and early results [J]. Safety Science, 2005, 9(1): 1-33.
[14] WIKIPEDIA.Practitioner [EB/OL].[2019-11-28]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practitioner.
[15] BRUN J P, LOISELLE C D. The roles, functions and activities of safety practitioners: the current situation in Québec [J]. Safety Science,2002,40(6): 519-536.
[16] BOOTH R T, HALE A R, DAWSON S. Identifying and registering safety practitioners [J]. Safety Science, 1991, 14 (3/4): 231-240.
[17] DAWSON S, POYNTER P, STEVENS D. Safety specialists in industry: roles, constraints and opportunities [J].Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1984, 5(4): 253-270.
[18] Board of Certified Safety Professionals.Complete guide to the CSP-application and examination information [Z], 2018.
[19] PRYOR P. Accredited OHS professional education: a step change for OHS capability [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 81: 5-12.
[20] PROVAN D J, DEKKE S W A, RAE A J. Bureaucracy, influence and beliefs:a literature review of the factors shaping the role of a safety professional [J]. Safety Science, 2017, 98: 98-112.
[21] JOURNE B. How to deal with the contradictions of safety professional development-an organizational approach based on discussion [C]. Beyond Safety Training-Embedding Safety in Professional Skills, Springer Nature, 2018: 103-111.
[22] 傅贵.美国注册安全师机制[J].现代职业安全, 2003(7):57-58.
[23] 樊晶光,位鑫,王宇航,等.注册安全工程师与企业安全管理人员现状比较分析[J].中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17 (7): 63- 67.
FAN Jingguang, WEI Xin, WANG Yuhang, et al. Comparative analysis between certified safety engineers [J].China Safety Science Jouranl, 2007,17(7): 63-67.
[24] 王茜,栗继祖.煤矿煤矿安全从业人员工作满意感与应激水平、自我效能感的关系[J].中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17 (2): 35-39.
WANG Qian, LI Jizu. The relation among job satisfaction stress level and self-efficacy of safety staff in coal mine [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2007,17(2): 35-39.
[25] 中华人民共和国第十二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十次会议.中华人民共和国安全生产法[L].2014-12-01.
[26] 劳动和社会保障部.中华人民共和国职业分类大典[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2015: 68-69.
[27] GB/T6565—2009,职业分类与代码[S].
GB/T6565-2009,Classification and code of occupation [S].
[28] 魏淑华. 教师职业认同研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2008.
WEI Shuhua. A research on teachers' professional identity [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2008.
[29] 马海媛. A 大学教师职业认同研究[D].保定:河北大学,2019.
MA Haiyuan. A study on teacher's professional identification of A university [D]. Baoding: Hebei University, 2019.
[30] 李丽,程久龙. 航空公司从业人员安全诚信影响因素实证研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(2): 153-159.
LI Li, CHENG Jiulong. Empirical study on factors influencing airline employees' safety integrity[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(2): 153-159.
[31] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010: 172-175.
[32] EBEL R L, FRISBIE D A. Essentials of educational measurement (5^th Edition) [M]. New Delhi:Prentice Hall of India Private Limited,1991: 221-225.
[33] 孟庆茂,刘红云.α系数在使用中存在的问题[J].心理学探新,2002, 22(3): 42-47.
MENG Qingmao, LIU Hongyun. The problem of using Alpha coefficient [J]. Psychological Discovery, 2002, 22 (3): 42-47.

安全从业人员职业认同测量模型的构建及应用

Development and application of professional identity measurement model for safety practitioners

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈巧, 刘素霞, 梅强, 张菁菁. 角色压力对员工安全行为影响的元分析:主管支持的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 21-27.
[2]	魏志杰, 殷腾飞, 王立杰. 煤矿安全诚信测量模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 149-154.
[3]	黄知恩, 吴超, 李明. 基于角色扮演的TTAE安全教育模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 116-121.
[4]	段伟利，陈国华. 企业安全生产管理责任矩阵应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(1): 118-.
[5]	李乃文，郑艳慧. 矿工工作应激与对策探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(6): 43-.
[6]	王茜，栗继祖. 煤矿安全从业人员工作满意感与应激水平、自我效能感的关系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 35-.